From owner-freebsd-bugs Fri Mar 27 08:08:13 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA19943 for freebsd-bugs-outgoing; Fri, 27 Mar 1998 08:08:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.119.24.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA19928 for ; Fri, 27 Mar 1998 08:08:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [194.198.43.36]) by ns1.yes.no (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA29190; Fri, 27 Mar 1998 16:05:21 GMT Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.6/8.8.6) id RAA15008; Fri, 27 Mar 1998 17:05:20 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <19980327170519.42224@follo.net> Date: Fri, 27 Mar 1998 17:05:19 +0100 From: Eivind Eklund To: Peter Wemm , Bruce Evans Cc: dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie, freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Subject: Re: bin/6124: Getting md5 to reset access times. References: <199803271055.VAA16967@godzilla.zeta.org.au> <199803271511.XAA14076@spinner.netplex.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.89.1i In-Reply-To: <199803271511.XAA14076@spinner.netplex.com.au>; from Peter Wemm on Fri, Mar 27, 1998 at 11:11:13PM +0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, Mar 27, 1998 at 11:11:13PM +0800, Peter Wemm wrote: > Bruce Evans wrote: > I wonder if the 'no' prefix could be used without too much drama? > ie: mount -u -o noasync /home vs. mount -u -o async /home. > Of course, the problem is when the option has a built-in 'no' prefix > already.. nonoatime anyone? :-) (not that this is hard to work around, > just it's a potential source of mistakes..) atime. It is just happens to be a default option; I can't see that it should be a large problem to implement it separately (but I haven't looked at the 'mount' source). Eivind. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message