From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 11 07:02:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFAAD16A4CE for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 07:02:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from redix.it (host49-169.pool8172.interbusiness.it [81.72.169.49]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5CBE243D39 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 07:02:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from roberto@redix.it) Received: (qmail 24968 invoked by uid 72); 11 Feb 2004 15:02:46 -0000 Received: from 192.168.0.77 (SquirrelMail authenticated user roberto) by mail.redix.it with HTTP; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 16:02:45 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <1287.192.168.0.77.1076511765.squirrel@mail.redix.it> In-Reply-To: <79D6F861-5C96-11D8-A225-000A95DA58FE@jimz.net> References: <1171.192.168.0.77.1076505166.squirrel@mail.redix.it> <79D6F861-5C96-11D8-A225-000A95DA58FE@jimz.net> Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 16:02:45 +0100 (CET) From: roberto@redix.it To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal Subject: Re: Question about securelevel X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Security issues [members-only posting] List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 15:02:50 -0000 > > On Feb 11, 2004, at 8:12 AM, roberto@redix.it wrote: > >> Could this configuration be considered secure, according to you? > > There's no way to determine that without some consideration of the > threats you are facing. Security considerations against simple attacks > (e.g., kiddies) are a lot different than considerations against > industrial espionage, against discovery by the secret police, and > against very smart government spies. > > What are you protecting? From whom? At what cost? > > --Jim > You are right: I agree with you that security consideration can be different depending on what to protect, from whom etc. And even a sigle machine implementing a packet-filter is only a little part of a firewall architecture. But my discussion is trying to address the weakness I red about securelevel into the mailing list archive. Could securelevel+readonly file system result in a more secure O.S.? Regards Roberto _______________________________________________ freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"