Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 10:05:52 -0500 (EST) From: Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <nick@garage.freebsd.pl> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, phk@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Multi-level jailing. Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1030220100414.76380A-100000@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <20030217070554.GE10767@garage.freebsd.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > I have prepared patch for jail functionality against FreeBSD > 5.0-CURRENT. It provides multi-level jailing and multiple ips for > jails. Sounds cool, although I haven't had a chance to read the patch yet. Question: how did you handle the problem (if at all) that INADDR_ANY doesn't perform a wildcard binding with multiple IPs in the same jail? It's not strictly required that it be handled, but it was always one of the semantic problems I bumped into when I experimented with more IPs. A single-IP jail "works" because it maps INADDR_ANY into the only IP available. I'll try to get a box up and running with these changes in the next few days and give them a spin. Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects robert@fledge.watson.org Network Associates Laboratories To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.96L.1030220100414.76380A-100000>