Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 04 Feb 2018 00:45:36 +0900
From:      Nobutaka Mantani <nobutaka@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com>
Cc:        Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>, Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r460814 - head/www/w3m
Message-ID:  <86wozut6u7.wl-nobutaka@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <201802031525.w13FPkPG004608@slippy.cwsent.com>
References:  <danfe@FreeBSD.org> <20180203144001.GB10426@FreeBSD.org> <201802031525.w13FPkPG004608@slippy.cwsent.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 04 Feb 2018 00:25:46 +0900,
Cy Schubert wrote:
> 
> In message <20180203144001.GB10426@FreeBSD.org>, Alexey Dokuchaev 
> writes:
> > On Sat, Feb 03, 2018 at 08:33:28AM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote:
> > > On Sat, Feb 03, 2018 at 02:12:57PM +0000, MANTANI Nobutaka wrote:
> > > >   Remove PORTREVISION that should be removed in the previous update.
> > > 
> > > Well, once it is in, it must stay in, if I understand things correctly.
> >
> > It was fixed pretty fast, so it's probably OK (typically I'd agree, hence
> > I've said "FYI").
> 
> I've been in that situation, when an upline vendor sends patches, 
> forgets to remove PORTREVSION and I don't catch it. It sucks but it is 
> what it is.
> 
> Due to timing of mirror updates and people running svnup someone may 
> have a port with PORTREVISION and when PORTREVISION is bumped to 1 
> again said persons will not receive an update. It's not OK. Either 
> revert the change or increase PORTEPOCH.

Thank you for your advice. I'll revert the previous commit.

--
Nobutaka Mantani
nobutaka@FreeBSD.org, nobutaka@nobutaka.org



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86wozut6u7.wl-nobutaka>