From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Feb 18 05:58:07 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E74916A4CE
	for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 05:58:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sakura.ninth-nine.com (sakura.ninth-nine.com [219.127.74.120])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3346F43D2D
	for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 05:58:07 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from melfina.ninth-nine.com ([IPv6:2002:d312:f91e::1])
	(authenticated bits=0) by sakura.ninth-nine.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/NinthNine)
	with ESMTP id i1IDw5Xh050695 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA
	bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 18 Feb 2004 22:58:05 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from
	nork@FreeBSD.org)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 22:58:05 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <200402181358.i1IDw5Xh050695@sakura.ninth-nine.com>
From: Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org>
To: Adam Weinberger <adamw@magnesium.net>
In-Reply-To: <20040218062743.GT53771@toxic.magnesium.net>
References: <20040218062743.GT53771@toxic.magnesium.net>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.9 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: www/flashpluginwrapper
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 13:58:07 -0000

On 18 Feb 2004 01:27:43 -0500
Adam Weinberger <adamw@magnesium.net> wrote:
> Please reconsider removing flashpluginwrapper. I find it ludicrous that
> I should have to manually apply a patch every time I want to update my
> system. As flashpluginwrapper works, there is no harm in allowing it to
> remain in the tree until such time as -STABLE actually support
> linuxpluginwrapper.
> This port is not deprecated. It is still of use to those of us who don't
> wish to be manually applying patches to src all the time.

	I don't know why you said such a thing.  I see.  linimon@ was
	committed about it.  OK.

	I will not remove flashpluginwrapper.  But I think that anyone
	doesn't want to use this port.  Because it was upgrade to
	linuxpluginwrapper.  Of cause, I know many people who is using
	non-libmap.conf(5) feature's environment.  So I'm keeping it.

	In the current case, I was wrong to set IGNORE.  So I'll change
	like following lines.  Please wait (or Adam, you can commit by
	my approval).

	1. remove IGNORE, EXPIRATION_DATE.
	2. change MAINTAINER to ports@.
	3. replace pre-everything:: or DEPRECATED from IGNORE message.

	Is this OK?