From owner-freebsd-python@freebsd.org Wed May 15 12:59:36 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-python@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 230E81590C02 for ; Wed, 15 May 2019 12:59:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA4F08A8F5 for ; Wed, 15 May 2019 12:59:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 6B6A61590C00; Wed, 15 May 2019 12:59:35 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: python@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59CAA1590BFF for ; Wed, 15 May 2019 12:59:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8C478A8F1 for ; Wed, 15 May 2019 12:59:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 345991DCB for ; Wed, 15 May 2019 12:59:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x4FCxYbs067126 for ; Wed, 15 May 2019 12:59:34 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x4FCxYhI067125 for python@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 15 May 2019 12:59:34 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: python@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 237911] lang/spidermonkey24: 'make configure' fails if devel/py-setuptools_scm is installed Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 12:59:33 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: kwm@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc flagtypes.name assigned_to keywords Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-python@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Python issues List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 12:59:36 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D237911 Kubilay Kocak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |koobs@FreeBSD.org, | |python@FreeBSD.org Flags| |maintainer-feedback?(kwm@Fr | |eeBSD.org) Assignee|ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org |kwm@FreeBSD.org Keywords| |needs-qa --- Comment #1 from Kubilay Kocak --- Thanks for the report John The port really shouldn't be creating a Python environment/virtualenv or fetching things to do so, and should (only) be using the system Python environment and *_DEPEND'ing on the requisite python packages it needs (if any). To confirm again, this behaviour *does not* occur if setuptools_scm port is= not installed? Is this a regression after a particular version, or did you just happen to notice it after something requiring setuptools_scm was installed? Is the issue contingent/dependent on an OPTION or other condition? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=