Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 22:02:22 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ipfw@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 253476] ipfw keepalive: tcp_do_segment: Timestamp missing, segment silently dropped Message-ID: <bug-253476-8303-3tA76QZwEn@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-253476-8303@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-253476-8303@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D253476 --- Comment #10 from Andrey V. Elsukov <ae@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Michael Tuexen from comment #9) > So you think it is good behaviour to let compliant end-points look as bro= ken ones? I did not investigate the problem and didn't read corresponding RFC, I even don't use keepalives personally, so I just say how it looks like from user point of view - it worked for 20 years, and now it doesn't :) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-253476-8303-3tA76QZwEn>