From owner-freebsd-current Wed Aug 26 06:17:25 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA27208 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Wed, 26 Aug 1998 06:17:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from tick.ssec.wisc.edu (tick.ssec.wisc.edu [144.92.108.121]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA27183; Wed, 26 Aug 1998 06:17:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dglo@tick.ssec.wisc.edu) Received: from tick.ssec.wisc.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tick.ssec.wisc.edu (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id IAA26671; Wed, 26 Aug 1998 08:16:22 -0500 (CDT) From: Dave Glowacki Message-Id: <199808261316.IAA26671@tick.ssec.wisc.edu> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" cc: "Gary Palmer" , alexandr@mail.eecis.udel.edu, Paul Richards , "'Philippe Regnauld'" , Chuck Robey , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Threads across processors In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 25 Aug 1998 20:41:22 PDT." <24733.904102882@time.cdrom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1998 08:16:21 -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > I don't know of enough PPC machines to make it worthwhile doing a port. At > > Macintoshes. iMACs especially. :) Not to put a damper on this, but... According to http://www.macosrumors.com/OSX.html MacOS X will already have a version of BSD built in and a command line interface will be available. Given that (and assuming the performance is somewhat decent), how likely would people be to trade access to MacOS applications for access to an open source OS? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message