From owner-freebsd-arch Mon Aug 21 15:54: 2 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from gw.nectar.com (gw.nectar.com [208.42.49.153]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3F7A37B616 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2000 15:54:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hamlet.nectar.com (hamlet.nectar.com [10.0.1.102]) by gw.nectar.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9B481925E; Mon, 21 Aug 2000 17:53:59 -0500 (CDT) Received: (from nectar@localhost) by hamlet.nectar.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id RAA26351; Mon, 21 Aug 2000 17:53:59 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from nectar@spawn.nectar.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2000 17:53:59 -0500 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" To: Daniel Eischen Cc: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is it time yet? [was Re: Weak symbols] Message-ID: <20000821175359.C26324@hamlet.nectar.com> Mail-Followup-To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" , Daniel Eischen , freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20000821105919.A25903@hamlet.nectar.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from eischen@vigrid.com on Mon, Aug 21, 2000 at 12:50:24PM -0400 X-Url: http://www.nectar.com/ Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Aug 21, 2000 at 12:50:24PM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: > I think this is a good idea, but should we also fix our internal > calls of foo() to _foo()? Yes, if `foo' has external linkage. > You also have to think about the threads library, both current and > future. We have to be able to build libc_r, and want in the future to > be able to build libpthread that can be linked with libc. Can you go into more detail here? Is there something special to do for libc_r? Thanks! -- Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.com / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message