From owner-freebsd-chat Tue Dec 24 21:46:10 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id VAA28650 for chat-outgoing; Tue, 24 Dec 1996 21:46:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from rocky.mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id VAA28609; Tue, 24 Dec 1996 21:44:46 -0800 (PST) Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.mt.sri.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id WAA09913; Tue, 24 Dec 1996 22:44:42 -0700 (MST) Date: Tue, 24 Dec 1996 22:44:42 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <199612250544.WAA09913@rocky.mt.sri.com> From: Nate Williams To: Aleph One Cc: freebsd-core@freebsd.org, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IP Filtering to www.freebsd.org In-Reply-To: References: Sender: owner-chat@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Aleph One writes: > I have come across some disturbing information. It seem that FreeBSD > project is filtering IP packets comming from the OpenBSD project. In > particular access from 199.185.137.*, and maybe 199.185.136.*, to > www.freebsd.org. If this is true it marks a very low point on the history > of FreeBSD. On what basis do you make these claims? I understand that at one point in time email from Theo was filtered out simply because he was spamming mailing lists and *abusing* FreeBSD resources, but claiming that there is intent to filter all IP packets from the OpenBSD sites is a pretty strong word, and I'd like to see what factual basis you are using to even imply such a time. > If the project is to succeed its in the basis of its quality, support, > and technical merits, and not by means of cheap tricks. Anyone wish to > comment? So, have you stopped beating your wife yet? Nate