From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 4 23:42:35 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75E10106564A for ; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 23:42:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18F098FC0A for ; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 23:42:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.28]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 04 Apr 2008 19:42:35 -0400 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.8.6-GA) with ESMTP id JUW67791; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 19:42:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 209-6-22-188.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.22.188]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 04 Apr 2008 20:46:46 -0400 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18422.48358.986043.561478@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 19:42:30 -0400 To: davidb@boothscientific.com In-Reply-To: <200804041831.51583.davidb@boothscientific.com> References: <200804040120.09070.softwareleute@freenet.de> <200804040147.36878.softwareleute@freenet.de> <20080404173336.1768653tvtohcpgc@intranet.encontacto.net> <200804041831.51583.davidb@boothscientific.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: openoffice and java X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2008 23:42:35 -0000 David Booth writes: > I do not have a suggested fix, but I found similar behavior when > I tried to compile it with JDK 1.6. Diablo 1.5 worked fine for > me though. From the Makefile: USE_JAVA= yes JAVA_BUILD= jdk JAVA_VENDOR= freebsd bsdjava .if (${OSVERSION} >= 700000) JAVA_VERSION= 1.5 .else JAVA_VERSION= 1.4 1.5 .endif OOv2 is not rated for JDK-1.6. Robert Huff