From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Jan 28 1: 5:30 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from blizzard.sabbo.net (ns.sabbo.net [193.193.218.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95D4C37B69E for ; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 01:05:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from vic.sabbo.net (root@vic.sabbo.net [193.193.218.112]) by blizzard.sabbo.net (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f0S953T22736; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 11:05:05 +0200 Received: (from max@localhost) by vic.sabbo.net (8.11.1/8.9.3) id f0S954110620; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 11:05:04 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) From: Maxim Sobolev Message-Id: <200101280905.f0S954110620@vic.sabbo.net> Subject: Re: Confused between the two freetypes To: dennis.glatting@software-munitions.com (Dennis Glatting) Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 11:05:03 +0200 (EET) Cc: ports@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <01012716081201.29980@kwijibo> from "Dennis Glatting" at Jan 27, 2001 04:08:12 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > XFree86-4 requires freetype2 whereas several ports who define > USE_FREETYPE bring in freetype. Are these two versions compatible? > Would it be best to modify bsd.port.mk not to define ttf.4 if freetype2 > is already installed? No, these two version are imcompatible at API and ABI levels. -Maxim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message