From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 1 14:40:02 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26445147 for ; Sun, 1 Dec 2013 14:40:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1207C17F0 for ; Sun, 1 Dec 2013 14:40:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id rB1Ee17x040272 for ; Sun, 1 Dec 2013 14:40:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id rB1Ee1qR040271; Sun, 1 Dec 2013 14:40:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2013 14:40:01 GMT Message-Id: <201312011440.rB1Ee1qR040271@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Torbjorn Granlund Subject: kern/183397: Kernel panic at first incoming ssh X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list Reply-To: Torbjorn Granlund List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2013 14:40:02 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/183397; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Torbjorn Granlund To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: kern/183397: Kernel panic at first incoming ssh Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2013 15:29:45 +0100 I spent a lot of time to supply needed information. Then silence. One month later, two BETA releases later. I didn't try the BETA from 2013-11-30, but since I've not gotten any indication of that the xn problem has been addressed, I might not be too pessimistic to assume that FreeBSD 10 still runs as poorly as indicated by my recent testing: http://gmplib.org/~tege/virt.html OK, you're in good company, only NetBSD and older FreeBSD runs well. The other BSDes work as poorly as or worse than FreeBSD 10. (No, I haven't reported the "filesystem malfunctions" problem which happens for 32-bit x86 under both Xen and Linux' KVM. It takes a lot of time to make good bug reports and to follow up timely, and my last few experiences of FreeBSD reporting has not encouraged me. To be fair, the filesystem malfunctions problem might have been fixed.) It's ironic that I cannot use FreeBSD now, since the virtualisation problems and the ignored bin/166994 makes no FreeBSD release or pre-rellease work on newer hardware for what I do. The next major GMP release will happen in a few weeks and that release will not work on FreeBSD as things stand now. (It might run on bare metal, but your bundled clang miscompiled GMP under x86-32 last time I tested...) FreeBSD surely doesn't look like it used to. I've been a user since FreeBSD 1.1. I've never seen such a mound of show-stopper bugs as I do now. Torbj=C3=B6rn Please encrypt, key id 0xC8601622