From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 8 08:52:40 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 856F0106564A for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 08:52:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirj.bris.ac.uk (dirj.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EE468FC08 for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 08:52:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncsc.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.41]) by dirj.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SRg9v-0007RW-BP for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 08 May 2012 09:52:39 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by ncsc.bris.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SRg9u-0001KO-GB for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 08 May 2012 09:52:39 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q488qcjq011720 for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 09:52:38 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q488qcBu011719 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 8 May 2012 09:52:38 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bris.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bris.ac.uk using -f Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 09:52:38 +0100 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120508085238.GA11712@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Subject: is 9.9 patch still necessary X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 08:52:40 -0000 I noticed that libtool-fixed is scheduled for deletion because libtool now works fine with 10.x. Does this mean that the 9.9 patch is no longer needed? Or has I misunderstood something? Thanks -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423