From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 27 07:44:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A618B16A402 for ; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 07:44:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from massimo@cedoc.mo.it) Received: from insomma.datacode.it (ip-174-86.sn2.eutelia.it [83.211.174.86]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F23643D45 for ; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 07:44:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from massimo@cedoc.mo.it) Received: from localhost (localhost.datacode.it [127.0.0.1]) by insomma.datacode.it (Postfix) with SMTP id E95402C906 for ; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 09:43:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from insomma.datacode.it (localhost.datacode.it [127.0.0.1]) by insomma.datacode.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8664E2C90A; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 09:43:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from massimo.datacode.it (massimo.datacode.it [192.168.1.13]) by insomma.datacode.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 428D12C906; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 09:43:53 +0200 (CEST) From: Massimo Lusetti To: Sam Leffler In-Reply-To: <444FAE19.3060404@errno.com> References: <444E2503.9090506@seclark.us> <6.2.3.4.0.20060425093417.068dfc08@64.7.153.2> <444E5608.4050704@seclark.us> <6.2.3.4.0.20060425134955.051d58d0@64.7.153.2> <444F750C.7070206@seclark.us> <444FAE19.3060404@errno.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: CEDOC - Modena Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 09:43:53 +0200 Message-Id: <1146123833.4327.2.camel@massimo.datacode.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 (2.0.4-7) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: Stephen.Clark@seclark.us, stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Freebsd Stable 6.x ipsec slower than with 4.9 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 07:44:17 -0000 On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 10:30 -0700, Sam Leffler wrote: > There are known locking bottlenecks in the crypto subsystem that fast > ipsec depends on. This is consistent with idle time going up. > > Not sure when they'll be fixed but I know they're important to at least > one person. Sorry to correct but... to at least two persons. -- Massimo There are more way to do things, one is the bsd-way the others are wrong