From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 5 19:22:34 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC05AF02; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 19:22:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay010.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay010.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.6.177]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F326E2A67; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 19:22:33 +0000 (UTC) X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApUGADMu4VNbsV3c/2dsb2JhbABbgw1STQrLcodMAYEVF3eEBAEFJxMcIxALDgoJJQ8qHgYTiEYBw3YXj0wHhEsBBJUqhmKBVZMNg087Lw Received: from 220.93-177-91.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org) ([91.177.93.220]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 05 Aug 2014 21:22:26 +0200 Received: from kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s75JMPfU005088; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 21:22:25 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from tijl@FreeBSD.org) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 21:22:24 +0200 From: Tijl Coosemans To: Bryan Drewery Subject: Re: Libreoffice library caching [was Re: Yet another pkg bug?] Message-ID: <20140805212224.33dbbd7c@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: <53E10592.1000308@FreeBSD.org> References: <53DB9BF4.5070208@netfence.it> <62714296e76c28f63d8b7ca430882a37@shatow.net> <53E10592.1000308@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org, office@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 19:22:34 -0000 On Tue, 05 Aug 2014 11:25:54 -0500 Bryan Drewery wrote: > Can office@ chime in on this? > > On 8/1/2014 7:27 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote: >> On 2014-08-01 08:53, Andrea Venturoli wrote: >>> On a 10.0/amd64 system: >>> >>>> # cat /usr/ports/UPDATING >>>> ... >>>> 20140730: >>>> AFFECTS: users of security/libgcrypt >>>> AUTHOR: pi@FreeBSD.org >>>> >>>> libgcrypt has been updated to 1.6.1 and all shared libraries >>>> versions have >>>> been bumped. So you need to rebuild all applications that depend on >>>> libgcrypt. >>>> >>>> # portmaster -r libgcrypt >>>> or >>>> # portupgrade -fr security/libgcrypt >>>> or >>>> # pkg install -fR security/libgcrypt >>>> ... >>>> # pkg info -r libgcrypt|less >>>> libgcrypt-1.6.1_1: >>>> libgnome-keyring-2.32.0_8 >>>> gnupg-2.0.25_1 >>>> libxslt-1.1.28_4 >>>> # pkg info -r libxslt | less >>>> libxslt-1.1.28_4: >>>> rarian-0.8.1_1 >>>> gnome-doc-utils-0.20.10_2 >>>> gtk-doc-1.18_1 >>>> inkscape-0.48.4_4 >>>> vala-0.20.1_1 >>>> policykit-gnome-0.9.2_7 >>>> raptor2-2.0.14 >>>> xmlto-0.0.26_2 >>>> shiboken-1.2.2 >>>> apiextractor-0.10.10_2 >>>> libreoffice-4.2.5_3 >>>> # portupgrade -frn libgcrypt >>>> ---> Listing the results (+:done / -:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) >>>> + security/libgcrypt (libgcrypt-1.6.1_1 -> libgcrypt-1.6.1_1) >>>> + textproc/libxslt (libxslt-1.1.28_4 -> libxslt-1.1.28_4) >>>> + security/gnupg (gnupg-2.0.25_1 -> gnupg-2.0.25_1) >>>> + security/libgnome-keyring (libgnome-keyring-2.32.0_8 -> >>>> libgnome-keyring-2.32.0_8) >>> >>> So, libreoffice is not rebuilt and after "portupgrade -fr libgcrypt"... >>> >>>> # libchk -v | less -S >>>> ... >>>> Binaries that are linked with: /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/libgcrypt.so.19 >>>> /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/libsoup-gnome-2.4.so.1.5.0 >>>> /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libxsltfilterlo.so >>> >>> ... libreoffice is still using the old library. >>> >>> >> >> Agreed it is not a pkg problem, nor a portupgrade problem. >> >> libreoffice is not directly depending on libgcrypt so it was not >> rebuilt. Only direct dependencies are rebuilt. But this is not really >> the problem. The problem is that Libreoffice seems to be doing something >> special by building its own libxsltfilterlo.so into its own directory. >> So the libxslt rebuild had no idea about it. It's not a file actually >> provided by libxslt. >> >> # pkg info -l libxslt|grep /usr/local/lib >> /usr/local/lib/libexslt.a >> /usr/local/lib/libexslt.la >> /usr/local/lib/libexslt.so >> /usr/local/lib/libexslt.so.8 >> /usr/local/lib/libxslt.a >> /usr/local/lib/libxslt.la >> /usr/local/lib/libxslt.so >> /usr/local/lib/libxslt.so.2 >> >> Note the lack of libxsltfilterlo.so. >> >> I'd say the instructions were lacking. My guess is a small handfull of >> people realize what's going on here and none of the other committers do. >> So it's very likely that many UPDATING entries need special libreoffice >> care as well and have not had it documented. I.e., every dependency of >> libreoffice would require rebuilding libreoffice. >> >> I'm not sure what this program/ dir is, perhaps some cache. It would be >> safer to have it disabled so this special care is not needed. It's not a special cache. It's just a normal library that libreoffice builds and installs. The library probably links to libexslt using "pkgconf --libs libexslt" which include -lgcrypt. Libreoffice should have had its PORTREVISION bumped as part of the libgcrypt update. There are other ports that should have been bumped. I'll look into it.