From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Jan 21 12: 7:55 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mink01.tirloni.co.uk (200-191-83-228-as.acessonet.com.br [200.191.83.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 266C637B401 for ; Sun, 21 Jan 2001 12:07:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from mink01 (mink01 [127.0.0.1]) by mink01.tirloni.co.uk (8.11.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f0LJqTR00587 for ; Sun, 21 Jan 2001 17:52:30 -0200 (BRST) (envelope-from tirloni@techie.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2001 17:52:29 -0200 (BRST) From: "Giovanni P. Tirloni" X-Sender: tirloni@mink01.tirloni.co.uk To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Securelevel idea Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, I was thinking about securelevels this afternoon and my brain came up with an idea: what about if we could set fine-grained securelevels? Like, each securelevel could have its own set of prohibitons and that could only be changed setting some option in the kernel and compiling a new one. The general idea is to give the machine's admin enough power so he/she can change it to his/her needs. Can anyone comment my idea ? Thanks in advance, Giovanni P. Tirloni tirloni@techie.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message