Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 15:01:31 -0500 From: David Gilbert <dgilbert@dclg.ca> To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jo=E3o_Carlos_Mendes_Lu=EDs?= <jonny@jonny.eng.br> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: List of fake vs. real SATA drives. Message-ID: <16802.17819.983480.763628@canoe.dclg.ca> In-Reply-To: <41A2444E.2090609@jonny.eng.br> References: <16798.12075.465147.307112@canoe.dclg.ca> <864qjixdpi.wl%sf@FreeBSD.org> <41A1FB7D.9000308@jonny.eng.br> <Pine.OSX.4.61.0411221417120.787@oof.local> <41A2444E.2090609@jonny.eng.br>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>>> "Joćo" == Joćo Carlos Mendes Luķs <jonny@jonny.eng.br> writes: Joćo> IIF they really have command queueing, I do believe. So, a Joćo> bridged SATA drive will not have command queuing, right? Well... from what I've read, the WD bridged drives do have queueing because they had an ATA-100 implementation of it. Joćo> Does FreeBSD already take advantage of this? How could I check Joćo> if my SATA drivers have command queueing or not? I'd like to know as well. Dave. -- ============================================================================ |David Gilbert, Independent Contractor. | Two things can only be | |Mail: dave@daveg.ca | equal if and only if they | |http://daveg.ca | are precisely opposite. | =========================================================GLO================
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?16802.17819.983480.763628>