From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Dec 5 9:18:49 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from warez.scriptkiddie.org (uswest-dsl-142-38.cortland.com [209.162.142.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D0CF37B405; Wed, 5 Dec 2001 09:18:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.69.11] (unknown [192.168.69.11]) by warez.scriptkiddie.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1FF762D01; Wed, 5 Dec 2001 09:18:46 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 09:19:08 -0800 (PST) From: Lamont Granquist To: Mike Barcroft Cc: Jim Durham , Jordan Hubbard , Jim Durham , Subject: Re: Can TCP changes be put in RELENG_4? In-Reply-To: <20011205115102.E63148@espresso.q9media.com> Message-ID: <20011205085750.I28101-100000@coredump.scriptkiddie.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG FWIW, I'd vote for "MFS"ing the TCP changes in -STABLE to RELENG_4_4. As it stands right now 4.4 is kinda broken. On Wed, 5 Dec 2001, Mike Barcroft wrote: > Jim Durham writes: > > Duh... right. OGS..(Old Guy Syndrome). I actually just did a cvsup to > > RELENG_4_4 and it didn't have the fixes. I guess I'll rephrase my > > question... "Can we have the patches in REGENG_4_4?". > > RELENG_4_4 is for security fixes only. Consider using -STABLE if you > require additional improvements. > > Best regards, > Mike Barcroft > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message