From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Sep 15 14:10:56 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1D651065675
	for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 14:10:56 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from avg@freebsd.org)
Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 010388FC1C
	for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 14:10:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from odyssey.starpoint.kiev.ua (alpha-e.starpoint.kiev.ua
	[212.40.38.101])
	by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id RAA09731;
	Wed, 15 Sep 2010 17:10:53 +0300 (EEST)
	(envelope-from avg@freebsd.org)
Message-ID: <4C90D3ED.6050108@freebsd.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 17:10:53 +0300
From: Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US;
	rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100909 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk>
References: <5DB6E7C798E44D33A05673F4B773405E@multiplay.co.uk><AANLkTikNhsj5myhQCoPaNytUbpHtox1vg9AZm1N-OcMO@mail.gmail.com><4C85E91E.1010602@icyb.net.ua><4C873914.40404@freebsd.org><20100908084855.GF2465@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua><4C874F00.3050605@freebsd.org><A6D7E134B24F42E395C30A375A6B50AF@multiplay.co.uk><4C8D087B.5040404@freebsd.org><03537796FAB54E02959E2D64FC83004F@multiplay.co.uk><4C8D280F.3040803@freebsd.org><3FBF66BF11AA4CBBA6124CA435A4A31B@multiplay.co.uk><4C8E4212.30000@freebsd.org>
	<B98EBECBD399417CA5390C20627384B1@multiplay.co.uk>
	<D79F15FEB5794315BD8668E40B414BF0@multiplay.co.uk>
	<4C90A92F.2090303@freebsd.org>
	<412E0DD28FEF4E25AB786C2B204D4BB5@multiplay.co.uk>
	<4C90B533.9030909@freebsd.org>
	<B0A86FD48D8048EBBD144399A81280CA@multiplay.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <B0A86FD48D8048EBBD144399A81280CA@multiplay.co.uk>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: zfs very poor performance compared to ufs due to lack of cache?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Filesystems <freebsd-fs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 14:10:56 -0000

on 15/09/2010 16:43 Steven Hartland said the following:
> 
> Hehe no problem would you like me to tar up our current zfs source?

No, thanks.
rXXXX plus diff will be sufficient.
(Yes, I am that stubborn).

-- 
Andriy Gapon