From owner-freebsd-java Wed Jul 10 16:46: 5 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0608E37B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 16:46:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ns.yogotech.com (ns.yogotech.com [206.127.123.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BA0543E31 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 16:46:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nate@yogotech.com) Received: from emerger.yogotech.com (emerger.yogotech.com [206.127.123.131]) by ns.yogotech.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA26312; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 17:45:59 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from nate@yogotech.com) Received: (from nate@localhost) by emerger.yogotech.com (8.12.5/8.12.3) id g6ANjxcd013306; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 17:45:59 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from nate) From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15660.50999.28887.442198@emerger.yogotech.com> Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 17:45:59 -0600 To: Bill Huey Cc: Nate Williams , "Georg-W. Koltermann" , freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD OS version for HotSpot (was: 1.3.1 patchset 7 not quite ready) In-Reply-To: <20020710234416.GD2394@gnuppy.monkey.org> References: <59063B5B4D98D311BC0D0001FA7E452205FDA83A@l04.research.kpn.com> <20020710102904.GA3882@gnuppy.monkey.org> <1026333648.676.22.camel@hunter.muc.macsch.com> <20020710232517.GB2394@gnuppy.monkey.org> <15660.50045.80305.351508@emerger.yogotech.com> <20020710234416.GD2394@gnuppy.monkey.org> X-Mailer: VM 7.07 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams) Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > > > The stuff that's in our CVS is only for -stable with a rather bad bug > > > fix patch of mine to libc_r. It's better all around to use -current or > > > -current's libc_r for this purpose instead of the -stable's libc_r. > > > Somebody will have to backport it to -stable like I said before. > > > > > > I'm about to remove all of that stuff (-stable support) in the CVSs, > > > so Greg's patch might be dated when it comes out. > > > > Why? > > Because working with -stable's libc_r is too problematic. Something > close to the real solution is to backport -current's libc_r or merge > the changes to it to -stable... I believe Dan is going to do this, but until that happens, why not just leave the -stable support in place? It certainly isn't hurting anything. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message