From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Oct 23 5:37:45 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D99BA37B401 for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 05:37:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from duke.cs.duke.edu (duke.cs.duke.edu [152.3.140.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25C2043E77 for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 05:37:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu) Received: from grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (grasshopper.cs.duke.edu [152.3.145.30]) by duke.cs.duke.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA29496; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 08:37:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from gallatin@localhost) by grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (8.11.6/8.9.1) id g9NCb7l08972; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 08:37:07 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu) From: Andrew Gallatin MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15798.38899.282938.431605@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 08:37:07 -0400 (EDT) To: Eric Anholt Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ati Rage 128: Dpms suspend failes In-Reply-To: <1035342556.883.7.camel@anholt.dyndns.org> References: <20021021171636.B324@snoopy.cablecom.ch> <1035222191.882.4.camel@anholt.dyndns.org> <15797.25277.327022.609027@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <1035342556.883.7.camel@anholt.dyndns.org> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.1 (patch 12) "Channel Islands" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Eric Anholt writes: > On Tue, 2002-10-22 at 07:37, Andrew Gallatin wrote: <..> > > Do I need something special in my /etc/X11/XF86Config to make this > > work? I never had problems on my old system (an alpha with a > > 3dlabs Permedia-2 based AGP card). > > Could you send me a > grep -i dpms /etc/X11/XF86Config /var/log/XFree86.0.log > ? OK, I'm an idiot. I did not have Option "DPMS" in the monior section of my XF86Config file. Sorry for wasting your time. But in my own defense... should xset even let me enable DPMS if its turned off at a lower level? If xset had complained and not allowed me to enable DPMS, I would have taken a harder look at my XF86Config file.. Talk about a POLA. Drew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message