From owner-freebsd-net Thu Oct 7 3:25:43 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (storm.freebsd.org.uk [194.242.128.198]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D563414C25 for ; Thu, 7 Oct 1999 03:25:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brian@Awfulhak.org) Received: from hak.lan.Awfulhak.org (root@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA70684; Thu, 7 Oct 1999 11:25:38 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from brian@Awfulhak.org) Received: from hak.lan.Awfulhak.org (brian@localhost.lan.Awfulhak.org [127.0.0.1]) by hak.lan.Awfulhak.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA04197; Thu, 7 Oct 1999 11:26:28 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from brian@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org) Message-Id: <199910071026.LAA04197@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Jason Lewis Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ppp In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 06 Oct 1999 20:43:47 MDT." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 07 Oct 1999 11:26:28 +0100 From: Brian Somers Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > How can one route public IP's over ppp without IP Masquerading? I tried > enabling forwarding, but it didnot work. Do I need to use pppd instead of > ppp? I'd advise using tcpdump (or enabling ppps tcp/ip logging) at each point of the packets journey to discover what's not forwarding it... Ppp is functionally the same as pppd in this respect. -- Brian Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour ! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message