From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 5 10:43:22 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E418637B401 for ; Mon, 5 May 2003 10:43:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ion.gank.org (ion.gank.org [198.78.66.164]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5AA943F93 for ; Mon, 5 May 2003 10:43:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from craig@xfoil.gank.org) Received: from localhost (ion.gank.org [198.78.66.164]) by ion.gank.org (GankMail) with ESMTP id 3365B2CFCA; Mon, 5 May 2003 12:43:21 -0500 (CDT) Received: from ion.gank.org ([198.78.66.164]) by localhost (ion.gank.org [198.78.66.164]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 95529-03-2; Mon, 5 May 2003 12:43:20 -0500 (CDT) Received: from owen1492.uf.corelab.com (pix.corelab.com [12.45.169.2]) by ion.gank.org (GankMail) with ESMTP id 47F0C2BBB7; Mon, 5 May 2003 12:43:20 -0500 (CDT) From: Craig Boston To: Kris Kennaway In-Reply-To: <20030505152136.GB31920@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <20030505052615.R2996@znfgre.qbhto.arg> <20030505142945.15738.qmail@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org> <20030505152136.GB31920@rot13.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1052156596.38008.4.camel@owen1492.uf.corelab.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.4 Date: 05 May 2003 12:43:17 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: Thomas Seck Subject: Re: HEADS UP! Kerberos5/Heimdal now default! X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 17:43:23 -0000 On Mon, 2003-05-05 at 10:21, Kris Kennaway wrote: > With recent changes, Kerberos is no longer separate or de-selectable > from sysinstall, unless you also get rid of e.g. openssh. That's part > of what we're discussing. Is there a set procedure for removing the Kerberos 5 bits after rebuilding with NO_KERBEROS set? I use MIT Kerberos installed via the port and have always had to make absolutely sure to NOT install the base system with Heimdal KRB5, lest other ports pick up the wrong header files. This was possible before with a custom install. I know that a find -mtime +1 should theoretically work, but that seems to be hackish at best... Craig