From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Apr 23 18:25:14 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: emulation@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2827D3F7;
 Thu, 23 Apr 2015 18:25:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ig0-x22b.google.com (mail-ig0-x22b.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22b])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6E541195;
 Thu, 23 Apr 2015 18:25:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by igbhj9 with SMTP id hj9so31484672igb.1;
 Thu, 23 Apr 2015 11:25:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :cc:content-type;
 bh=Ke9sB/Elrb9hiIHVrAJlcE+gflmypZly9KXAmd4Rn1g=;
 b=BVk9vTRGieyMWVoUFiao5XXyFe5rqBUqgnUDXRkt7Sbv2OXA4GqMsKNLHaQl2iPN0x
 QdnGDq4lqASp2pzLwSkziu60F0MVYcA+Rdxq3SdSVw31v6vr45yRnMqxi6Q2YiblA/vs
 d2AoaF8kzDVk+fJ6qlDEnBbWeOjaJuzKvzhfrf/xK13v8OAGTaW/U3l8VKxZxWUh50q9
 yrrufei01DcZ49lbGxYd3x8NEa9c9RoC0vmA1UARDK6nJzdD44AyE9t8eUvySNRe1EM+
 9eD6e5O0S//nyK+Ym07213AK8l0r6uGhMYcq/ip0FDBiqc4UojjbdTxdoWDZSKvL+mrA
 QaOg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.166.203 with SMTP id p194mr5797126ioe.30.1429813513341; 
 Thu, 23 Apr 2015 11:25:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.107.130.204 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 11:25:13 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20150423180414.GB20980@mx12.chaot.net>
References: <CALe6D=uvf10AuwVjL9EMiTjGG=fdEy2YOOQPEVUFOU=QDqinPA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20150423172801.GA20980@mx12.chaot.net>
 <CALe6D=t_8zr5qOnPqXG=XcOos=eo0OK0ZxwuJsRR+31P0UsO4g@mail.gmail.com>
 <20150423180414.GB20980@mx12.chaot.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 20:25:13 +0200
Message-ID: <CALe6D=uhTNnGfMK6-cMe-b=StAAC4x3HPNyUKK-cGgT=GhcScg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: linux-c6-flashplugin-11.2r202.457 issue
From: Xavier <xavierfreebsdquestions@gmail.com>
To: Johannes Meixner <xmj@freebsd.org>
Cc: emulation@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems
 <freebsd-emulation.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-emulation>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 18:25:14 -0000

On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 09:04:14PM +0300, Johannes Meixner wrote:

Hi Johannes ,

> Xavier,
>
> I've been able to produce produce something similar on 11.0-CURRENT.
>
> xmj@mx12:~$ firefox
> (process:22482): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_slice_set_config: assertion 'sys_page_size == 0' failed
> >>> installPolicy shouldProcess() ...
> >>> installPolicy shouldProcess() ...
> >>> installPolicy shouldProcess() ...
> >>> installPolicy shouldProcess() ...
> Fontconfig error: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/10-scale-bitmap-fonts.conf", line 70: non-double matrix element
> Fontconfig error: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/10-scale-bitmap-fonts.conf", line 70: non-double matrix element
> Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/10-scale-bitmap-fonts.conf", line 78: saw unknown, expected number
>
> ** (firefox:22482): CRITICAL **: gst_app_src_set_size: assertion 'GST_IS_APP_SRC (appsrc)' failed
>
> ** (firefox:22482): CRITICAL **: gst_app_src_set_size: assertion 'GST_IS_APP_SRC (appsrc)' failed
>
> ** (firefox:22482): CRITICAL **: gst_app_src_set_size: assertion 'GST_IS_APP_SRC (appsrc)' failed
> >>> installPolicy shouldProcess() ...
> >>> installPolicy shouldProcess() ...
>
> I'm not sure what's happening here. I've checked the new libflashplayer.so --
> all libraries exist in the /compat/linux tree -- and I've mounted linprocfs,
> linsysfs, and dev to the appropriate places ...
>
> Could be that Adobe's messed up something?
>

Adobe's ? What ?

See you.