From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Aug 31 14:41:33 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15509E1FEF5 for ; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 14:41:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank2@fjl.co.uk) Received: from bs1.fjl.org.uk (bs1.fjl.org.uk [84.45.41.196]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "bs1.fjl.org.uk", Issuer "bs1.fjl.org.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC6BB7ECE8 for ; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 14:41:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank2@fjl.co.uk) Received: from [10.4.242.25] ([46.233.78.25]) (authenticated bits=0) by bs1.fjl.org.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v7VEfTSP009900 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 15:41:30 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from frank2@fjl.co.uk) Message-ID: <59A8201D.5010702@fjl.co.uk> Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 15:41:33 +0100 From: Frank Leonhardt Reply-To: frank2@fjl.co.uk Organization: Frank Leonhardt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fun with HAST and inter-host connections References: <6cc75798-b7f2-b794-faec-8807616fd7f4@fjl.co.uk> <4199b174-63df-a6a8-6e8e-0e7330dd189f@laverenz.de> In-Reply-To: <4199b174-63df-a6a8-6e8e-0e7330dd189f@laverenz.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 14:41:33 -0000 On 31/08/2017 13:07, Uwe Laverenz wrote: > Hi, > > Am 30.08.2017 um 23:40 schrieb Frank Leonhardt: > >> Thoughts anyone? In particular, is the USB 3.1 idea crazy? And is >> anyone else crazy enough to be trying the same thing? > > 5) 1Gb ethernet and multipathing: use 2 or more interfaces for iSCSI. > The problem with link aggregation is that you need lots of 1Gb Ethernet cards and run out PCI slots pretty quickly. Or are you suggesting multiple targets bound to a particular interface? Not a bad idea, but the same applies to slots, and you're also limited to 1Gb unless it happens to spread across devices. The PCIe is also going to be a bottleneck, but I'm ignoring this for now. What I really want is the fastest way to connect to boxes using IP (preferably). A geom class using some other hardware might be the best way, but I don't want to launch in to writing one if there's an easy way. Regards, Frank.