Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 22 Jul 2003 01:45:48 +0200
From:      des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=)
To:        Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>
Cc:        i386@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on i386/i386
Message-ID:  <xzpznj778b7.fsf@dwp.des.no>
In-Reply-To: <20030721220459.37E8E2A8B2@canning.wemm.org> (Peter Wemm's message of "Mon, 21 Jul 2003 15:04:59 -0700")
References:  <20030721220459.37E8E2A8B2@canning.wemm.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> writes:
> Hmm. I thought it was gzip that was dying. Looks like its make instead, a=
nd
> is rather consistent.

"told you so"

> So, who has been messing with make(1) lately?

I believe that the problem is in the kernel, not in make(1); it just
happens to be triggered by make(1) because it is a big (if not the
biggest) vfork(2) consumer.

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpznj778b7.fsf>