Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 01:45:48 +0200 From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> Cc: i386@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on i386/i386 Message-ID: <xzpznj778b7.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20030721220459.37E8E2A8B2@canning.wemm.org> (Peter Wemm's message of "Mon, 21 Jul 2003 15:04:59 -0700") References: <20030721220459.37E8E2A8B2@canning.wemm.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> writes: > Hmm. I thought it was gzip that was dying. Looks like its make instead, a= nd > is rather consistent. "told you so" > So, who has been messing with make(1) lately? I believe that the problem is in the kernel, not in make(1); it just happens to be triggered by make(1) because it is a big (if not the biggest) vfork(2) consumer. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpznj778b7.fsf>