From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Jan 21 01:16:27 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id BAA07258 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Wed, 21 Jan 1998 01:16:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from lsd.relcom.eu.net (ache@lsd.relcom.eu.net [193.124.23.23]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id BAA07248; Wed, 21 Jan 1998 01:16:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ache@lsd.relcom.eu.net) Received: (from ache@localhost) by lsd.relcom.eu.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA03239; Wed, 21 Jan 1998 12:16:00 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 1998 12:15:57 +0300 (MSK) From: =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= X-Sender: ache@lsd.relcom.eu.net To: Satoshi Asami cc: peter@netplex.com.au, perhaps@yes.no, gpalmer@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG, committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: amanda port, empty PATCH_STRIP= lines causes trouble In-Reply-To: <199801210839.AAA20720@baloon.mimi.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, 21 Jan 1998, Satoshi Asami wrote: > * If you mean "hacked" FreeBSD variant as /usr/bin/opatch and unmodified GNU > * variant as /usr/bin/patch, I agree. > > Yes. Ok, who will handle this and how? (I don't have -stable running to test proper installation completely) > I'm sure you proposed upgrading patch to 2.5 but honestly I didn't > realize you said so until I saw the import message. Although I can't > speak of others, I think this is how many people saw it. Now in the story so far, I ask Peter to restore -current patch from the Attic and made port of patch 2.5 instead. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://www.nagual.pp.ru/~ache/