Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 12 Sep 2012 21:35:03 +0200
From:      Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net>
To:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Cc:        Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com>, Alexander Yerenkow <yerenkow@gmail.com>, Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>, freebsd-usb@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Raspberry PI gets USB support [FreeBSD 10 current]
Message-ID:  <201209122135.03654.hselasky@c2i.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAPJF9wkbXvKf%2B36_xjrn2N5QU026dNtBk1WPgJfk_y%2BCzWcf%2Bw@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <201209101654.00891.hselasky@c2i.net> <CAGH67wQ6CqtGa0s=jCosD3%2B6=nw2gGU%2B41VguAU4EAwVz=zQ-A@mail.gmail.com> <CAPJF9wkbXvKf%2B36_xjrn2N5QU026dNtBk1WPgJfk_y%2BCzWcf%2Bw@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday 12 September 2012 12:24:58 Alexander Yerenkow wrote:
> We tested kernel built by gonzo@, there working framebuffer, ue0, and
> USB2.0 devices (in theory, I didn't have those).
> But after some activity (like download few megabytes file) all is stuck
> with message
> usb device stalled
> 
> This is getting 100% repeatedly, no matter if download goes to sd card, or
> to malloc-md-device.
> If (When) this will be fixed, then Rpi would be a candy, prepared to
> testing and more or less usable.
> I have in plans try it with xorg-framebuffer, and with directfb, while
> there's no video support.

Hi,

You should try a kernel after "r240419"

Right now my code uses PIO mode and is a bit slow, but it should be more 
stable. Let's start from there and work on upwards?

Anyone care to look into to optimising bus_space_region_4() calls to use 
load/store multiple?

--HPS



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201209122135.03654.hselasky>