Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 14:37:34 -0600 From: Ade Lovett <ade@FreeBSD.org> To: joseph@randomnetworks.com Cc: Nick Sayer <nsayer@quack.kfu.com>, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Best way to do this? Message-ID: <20001114143734.G31910@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0011141213050.304-100000@rodan.water-programs.com>; from joseph@randomnetworks.com on Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 12:14:06PM -0800 References: <20001114133608.C31910@FreeBSD.org> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0011141213050.304-100000@rodan.water-programs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 12:14:06PM -0800, joseph@randomnetworks.com wrote: > If you are looking for votes to do this count me for one. At a > minimum the layout for all of the Apache ports should be identical. 4.2 > should not go out the door with out this. Well, I'd be a lot happier about doing the drive-by if someone other than me can grab the patchball, apply it, and check that it works for their setup. A functional, but-in-the-wrong-place apache13-modssl port is better than a broken-but-in-the-right-place version :) -aDe -- Ade Lovett, Austin, TX. ade@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD: The Power to Serve http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001114143734.G31910>