From nobody Fri Mar 8 03:54:14 2024 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4TrXNQ6wCGz5ClF0 for ; Fri, 8 Mar 2024 03:54:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TrXNQ5q0cz4Rmk for ; Fri, 8 Mar 2024 03:54:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1709870054; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=oL4vZgUCjwMCgALUix/BZgQ+V7aHmk29Gz8cWDGsTleIhKGnpV7nJIlkUu5SprxRjwBIPI bE9gra842BgsEAbuH4IbcBmbyKmMlwXwFP0Vl5ANmsGBB7EllXSCMZXprSwIAH1Tqz+UXL 1aJ/D5YTdxJZJOfdxywkH0xUB4RhlpydKvA4nSWxFHVdWmSmC0M2owEfmeCIWDbwCnjQmB cnq367azb066CFDPVt728pWR7SFC9Wosw28IShA2ZTaKHhG7LUDryZ8H8ctvVqGrIZr/Fq dJI64dkA4e+9PPF7ULI/CTvPkke6s9x3XeTEjtUZ0Hoy+qkRbbYvjn4pLCd0Kw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1709870054; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=zuEixgVGFuZyYkcUd5pFpiKp/dBxu4Z8arhLoqCz65c=; b=xkxWH2vXWPUmiMpR/zvGyr6aQjV5Rvd+Bo8rJM0rlgyjF7NpXGbZCvT0a32+L3KRYi14fm gfzakSuZI5RzVQYwrQmiFNK60sM+/teqDjuvA92ZCyuXdhKYRovLHP3X3k2SoTpjq//SZY 24l8yKm6ua10BZ6SN30wG+NDRrRR7I2hyjOWDxWjZWlES5p5tqFQ+rWFA9btgR3s+6KYWr SODYUzNOVrBO54sWE2hR08Xiiweyr8zWQemOzDBKORYAtUNp8yIMX4HNMX+/t954Gmhq+z 9UXkqGEh8xknFVjkI0ZCxRUufohwfn0E9K1iFM7jlry98FKEjMEJT9ZQdPtbKg== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TrXNQ5PSRz12lj for ; Fri, 8 Mar 2024 03:54:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 4283sEBR029252 for ; Fri, 8 Mar 2024 03:54:14 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 4283sEiA029251 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 8 Mar 2024 03:54:14 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 277349] The net.inet.ip.source_address_validation should ignore CARP IP in backup state Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2024 03:54:14 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: zlei@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D277349 --- Comment #6 from Zhenlei Huang --- (In reply to Gleb Smirnoff from comment #1) > I think we had discussion on this some time ago. I suggested to make the > BACKUP IP address to be treated as non-local for all purposes except bind= (2). Generally good. And, the bind socket should not accept any incoming connect= ions even they are locally originated. > Here is a patch to try. I did not test it, but it gives an idea on what > am I talking about. It should change more that just source IP address > validation. The main question is whether there are any scenario that the > patch would break. The change seems good if we treat CARP BACKUP IP addresses as NOT **local**. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=