From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 17 02:07:18 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2618106566B for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 02:07:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matheusber@gmail.com) Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com (qw-out-2122.google.com [74.125.92.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 528708FC08 for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 02:07:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matheusber@gmail.com) Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 3so1830790qwe.7 for ; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 19:07:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:received:received :message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:subject:from:to:user-agent :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-priority :importance; bh=5vtcjhGYhlonb0u8L3epeE36ADN9szlM4TPOh054IQo=; b=le5ZKo1fRso9l8ZQ4NHniZ66iVPUrON6JvWtDORfOymaO1MLO8BTpp+oon39/+Q3H5 R6GUuq8wCK44PulP4rGfaNExC8vr/zvXgCxw5Rou5pB0IVaW9g244imgH+nUy4aaNPoA pByUokq0jushmTP/EOxdl1at5tEBFE3E+dmzw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:subject:from:to :user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-priority:importance; b=hJkBiQcGUCrPUEFNqiGfJLFaIOmlyZKv1hvDP6AWyeN6/V12AYMV59G37A7LU7hIOK 6zdQ9JGVDRMNMlmhfAInTl9/Y+U3SO9ubfNUoqtG/Yi3s3rC7mzeN7j19oU0ath9n1uD fl5GY7nb8bLk/aKg0XCeEiATWWePE8HR+HVxc= Received: by 10.224.60.138 with SMTP id p10mr6845899qah.232.1237255637781; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 19:07:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cygnus.homeunix.com (201008160048.user.veloxzone.com.br [201.8.160.48]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 5sm587106yxt.14.2009.03.16.19.07.16 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 16 Mar 2009 19:07:17 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Nenhum_de_Nos Received: by cygnus.homeunix.com (Postfix, from userid 80) id DDFE1B8074; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 23:07:12 -0300 (BRT) Received: from 10.1.1.80 (SquirrelMail authenticated user matheus) by 10.1.1.10 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 23:07:12 -0300 (BRT) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20090316155957.GA2385@carrot> References: <20090316155800.GA2257@carrot> <20090316155957.GA2385@carrot> Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 23:07:12 -0300 (BRT) From: "Nenhum_de_Nos" To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.15 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: Re: [HEADS UP] Merge of projects/gvinum to head X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 02:07:18 -0000 On Mon, March 16, 2009 12:59, Ulf Lilleengen wrote: > On man, mar 16, 2009 at 04:58:00pm +0100, Ulf Lilleengen wrote: >> Hello, >> >> This is a heads-up for a merge of gvinum project code into HEAD. This >> means >> that gvinum implementation will be changed some. The code is based on >> the >> work done by Lukas Ertl as well as the work I did before/during Google >> SoC >> 2007 and afterwards. It has been staying in p4 for some time, and then >> moved >> to the subversion project repository not long ago. The main reason for >> the >> delay of getting this into HEAD have been the lack of reviewers of the >> code, >> but after some discussion and help from testers, I've decided this is a >> good >> time to get it in (should perhaps have been merged a bit earlier) >> Testers >> have spotted several differences from the original gvinum, and I've >> tried to >> make it behave as the old implementation wherever that seemed the best >> way to >> go. Luckily, the work has gotten a bit of attention lately, thanks to >> Rick C. >> Petty for helping out with testing and bugfixing, as well as all others >> who >> have dared to run the new gvinum. So, what does this update offer? > > And I plan on importing it within 1-2 weeks :) great work, thanks. what's the status of raid5 ? is it ok to production enviroments ? I have been using gmirror and gstripe just cause I can't do raid5 and I'm waiting for ZFS to hit production state. thanks, matheus -- We will call you cygnus, The God of balance you shall be