Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 18:15:41 +0100 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Roland Dowdeswell <elric@imrryr.org> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FUD about CGD and GBDE Message-ID: <9268.1109870141@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 03 Mar 2005 11:59:18 EST." <20050303165918.26C633700F@arioch.imrryr.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20050303165918.26C633700F@arioch.imrryr.org>, Roland Dowdeswell writes: >I chose CGD with AES256 for two reasons. First I wanted to compare >systems with comparable performance. "More computing sins are committed in the name of efficiency (without necessarily achieving it) than for any other single reason - including blind stupidity." -- W.A.Wulf GBDE has two major designgoals: Security and Usability/Deployability. Performance is somewhere down the list after those two. I'm looking forward to seeing something from you which amounts to more than name-calling and hand-waving. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9268.1109870141>