From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jan 25 09:49:02 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F55A106566C
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Sun, 25 Jan 2009 09:49:02 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from ed@hoeg.nl)
Received: from palm.hoeg.nl (mx0.hoeg.nl [IPv6:2001:7b8:613:100::211])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA1988FC14
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Sun, 25 Jan 2009 09:49:01 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from ed@hoeg.nl)
Received: by palm.hoeg.nl (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 14F4A1CC25; Sun, 25 Jan 2009 10:49:01 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 10:49:01 +0100
From: Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl>
To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
Message-ID: <20090125094901.GE41248@hoeg.nl>
References: <497BA91D.805@elischer.org> <20090125094342.GD41248@hoeg.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nG7dHWd/DOCuxGWF"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20090125094342.GD41248@hoeg.nl>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Cc: arch@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: need for another mutex type/flag?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 09:49:02 -0000


--nG7dHWd/DOCuxGWF
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

* Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> wrote:
> I thought we already supported something like that. Isn't
> THREAD_NO_SLEEPING() and THREAD_SLEEPING_OK() exactly what you describe?

Oh wait, never mind. That only prevents a thread from sleeping on a
sleepqueue.

--=20
 Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl>
 WWW: http://80386.nl/

--nG7dHWd/DOCuxGWF
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAkl8NYwACgkQ52SDGA2eCwUNMwCfW1YyQDMxOkk371gW0Nh9Wy3G
iKQAnAv47Uq580sP6EbthCOCftLHNOdm
=WAD6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nG7dHWd/DOCuxGWF--