From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 16:01:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8747616A4CE; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:01:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org (bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org [198.22.63.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4188943D3F; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:01:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mwlucas@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org) Received: from bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org (mwlucas@localhost [127.0.0.1])i5SG1VuF092871; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 12:01:31 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mwlucas@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org) Received: (from mwlucas@localhost)i5SG1UAH092870; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 12:01:31 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mwlucas) Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 12:01:30 -0400 From: "Michael W. Lucas" To: Rob Message-ID: <20040628160130.GA92831@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> References: <40DF92F2.2030407@users.sourceforge.net> <20040628145027.GA92086@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> <40E03C05.4070001@users.sourceforge.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40E03C05.4070001@users.sourceforge.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Spam-Score: (0) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39 cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Maximum uptime 497 days? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:01:34 -0000 On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 12:40:53AM +0900, Rob wrote: > Michael W. Lucas wrote: > >Hi, > > > >This tickles something in the back of my memory. > > > >You aren't by chance talking about remote uptime detection, > >Netcraft-style, are you? > > > >IIRC, that rolls over to 0 at 497 days. But actual system uptime is > >unaffected. > > Yes, I read it first time on a Netcraft's webpage, then googled and found > other reports as well. So this 497 limitation is only for Netscaft's way > of measuring up-time? > > Rob. Yep. It's a counter that rolls over in the TCP stack. ==ml -- Michael Lucas mwlucas@FreeBSD.org, mwlucas@BlackHelicopters.org "I'm sorry, but 'Social Darwinism' is no excuse for killing all of your co-workers." -- Ivan Brunetti http://www.BlackHelicopters.org/~mwlucas/