From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Sep 21 17:01:44 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 922F2E10FD7 for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 17:01:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io0-x230.google.com (mail-io0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 585D8112F for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 17:01:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: by mail-io0-x230.google.com with SMTP id g32so12340343ioj.2 for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 10:01:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=01oKxzkio4KI3vr83DuKkyAl8/HU6H04NWbPbNN1S0o=; b=GLJOdtMRevOxYr46yzIIggfPEDKzEFaZyjolRrgmCudTgNkqZXPOB/PBO/t413kqBU xdmExiji5Gk3S+e9U3qJbUxTvcew48f/TBf3nbcGtbqsB8WWTVmSGQi0twHwr9eTlFtu UZxTD1jZN05y1c0p4AqCPwYuYOP+7Y+PdaVeqfxpT/5IPPm+iU5o1bikZbdEGyUEGL/H INmGcctVEH+UOrQ8EVGcIVY65hLKdCELCZ3BTZ5EfJlx2z9GdhQX7N8dggDIXgQ86WG4 E3HXu0XrgsTdUJ8WCnujnAxl8VZu0ueSRhgvVl44F+o3Qlq+vveY4dpTVCyoHmoYrDL3 R6xA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=01oKxzkio4KI3vr83DuKkyAl8/HU6H04NWbPbNN1S0o=; b=htab/cGiSMRdQmgw0SwsCg7Uo2r1ZyknZerZ4POmE/8uTJh1JbVh3XcXgASvGNQAn6 K32jgdzjAePzZOAcIwCSYhhwfrSzPeWAv1id20J7Sgp16zKUqIwreoNzXODsxtI4T6Jy JHNfeylin+BXEafgb2pHxMOk4EmuZ2N43ebWflY/YaBe0kKnr9N+Y//i2eZROkpUsDYW g0cquIDLa/xBSqNeoXc3HLV9ethb09aClttwBNU6APby5AxptpARZTAT24qTHqsqhA6l ELuNhF5NMhh4w60Dx0Pxa1wsAJAh04N8k4xjkRRyYNmDh2MelgOhr1Gu+Gy5aUF9+SkK w7aQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUgYI7kXyMGHQMpbRjNahEJJFmu5FlpgXNDP/W3MmBAgpxvHCnyv 8Fq0zKczImMtoTDl78ouchUkcO/0Uzagts3NdIk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QB4JLNCDhw9Fx+XkKKnpPrlqnk58Q+WRVibnjK3QxBWT7W//VyDh26AKNAueMtXmNIKWrrRxqfhz436dG1KOUI= X-Received: by 10.107.183.213 with SMTP id h204mr4283473iof.61.1506013302835; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 10:01:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.2.145.141 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 10:01:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20170921140921.GA71093@regency.nsu.ru> References: <20170921140921.GA71093@regency.nsu.ru> From: Adam Vande More Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 12:01:42 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FreeBSD Bridging doesn't work on FreeBSD 11 To: Alexey Dokuchaev Cc: Gerhard Schmidt , Freebsd Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 17:01:44 -0000 On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > I don't have a precise answer to your question, but certain network > features had been broken in FreeBSD 11+, including bridging [1] and > LAGG [2]. You might want to try 10.4 for the time being as there's > currently low interest in fixing those regressions, unfortunately. > > ./danfe > It is disingenuous to imply things are broken when they are not. The first link you sent isn't close to conclusive, and may have absolutely nothing to do with a bridge per se. You can also find the OP's more in-depth description in the mailing list archives along with other relevant information to your "broken" claim. Many of us are using bridges without issue. For example: bridge0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 description: vm-public ether 02:68:50:0c:f1:00 inet 172.16.0.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 172.16.0.255 nd6 options=1 groups: bridge id 00:00:00:00:00:00 priority 0 hellotime 2 fwddelay 15 maxage 20 holdcnt 6 proto rstp maxaddr 2000 timeout 1200 root id 00:00:00:00:00:00 priority 0 ifcost 0 port 0 member: tap0 flags=143 ifmaxaddr 0 port 5 priority 128 path cost 2000000 member: wlan0 flags=143 ifmaxaddr 0 port 3 priority 128 path cost 33333 # freebsd-version -ku 11.1-STABLE 11.1-STABLE If things like bridge or lagg were actually broken in some non-edge case, hard to replicate way then it would receive its due attention. If you've got an edge case no one else can replicate, it's probably going to sit out there awhile. -- Adam