From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 14 08:54:38 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 271D716A4CE for ; Sun, 14 Dec 2003 08:54:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.mho.com (smtp.mho.net [64.58.4.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 36B4243D35 for ; Sun, 14 Dec 2003 08:54:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) Received: (qmail 50601 invoked by uid 1002); 14 Dec 2003 16:54:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO freebsd.org) (64.58.1.252) by smtp.mho.net with SMTP; 14 Dec 2003 16:54:32 -0000 Message-ID: <3FDC9578.4080407@freebsd.org> Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 09:53:12 -0700 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031103 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= References: <200312140716.hBE7G8eF064492@gw.catspoiler.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit cc: mckusick@mckusick.com cc: mb@imp.ch cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: alc@freebsd.org cc: jroberson@chesapeake.net cc: Don Lewis Subject: Re: HAVE TRACE & DDB Re: FreeBSD 5.2-RC1 released X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 16:54:38 -0000 Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Don Lewis writes: > >>I'm guessing that the purpose of this code is to unmount devfs from /dev >>so that when the base distribution is unpacked it can populate /dev from >>the tarball. > > > Why would sysinstall need to populate /dev from the tarball? > > DES In case devfs fails to mount for some reason, it's nice to have some default nodes in /dev to help things from getting ugly. However, in the face of static majors going away, this might not be useful any more. I'm not even sure anymore if static dev nodes are included in the base distribution bits. Scott