From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 1 20:41:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21C7116A407 for ; Wed, 1 Nov 2006 20:41:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chinhngt@sectorb.msk.ru) Received: from hq.sectorb.msk.ru (petaflop.b.gz.ru [194.88.210.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3093D43D7C for ; Wed, 1 Nov 2006 20:40:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chinhngt@sectorb.msk.ru) Received: from it.local (it.local [172.16.20.8]) by hq.sectorb.msk.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52D6B2B3C; Wed, 1 Nov 2006 23:40:27 +0300 (MSK) Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 23:40:39 +0300 (MSK) From: Nguyen Tam Chinh X-X-Sender: chinhngt@it.hackers To: Mark Andrews In-Reply-To: <200611011927.kA1JRCCE002777@drugs.dv.isc.org> Message-ID: <20061101231511.U923@it.hackers> References: <200611011927.kA1JRCCE002777@drugs.dv.isc.org> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6-STABLE Keywords: 216091683 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bind9 trouble in -PRERELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 20:41:29 -0000 On Thu, 2 Nov 2006, Mark Andrews wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I have a server with busy local DNS (bind 9.3.2-P1, listen on localhost). >> The bind9 got strange problem and gone away for the last some days: >> >> Oct 31 11:34:49 cat9 named[500]: >> /usr/src/lib/bind/isc/../../../contrib/bind9/lib/isc/mem.c:628: >> INSIST(((unsigned char *)mem >> )[size] == 0xbe) failed >> Oct 31 11:34:49 cat9 named[500]: exiting (due to assertion failure) >> Oct 31 11:34:49 cat9 kernel: pid 500 (named), uid 53: exited on signal 6 >> >> The kernel and world (included bind9) were updated to 6.2-PRERELEASE of >> 30.10. >> Please advice if you have any further information. >> Thank you. > > Post a stack bactrace. > I don't think that I can do a stack backtrace when named left no core after that. ----- With best regards, | The Power to Serve Nguyen Tam Chinh | http://www.FreeBSD.org Loc: sp.cs.msu.su |