From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Jun 29 04:20:16 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id EAA26708 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Mon, 29 Jun 1998 04:20:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from yoda.pi.musin.de (yoda.pi.musin.de [194.246.250.12]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id EAA26618 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 1998 04:20:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sec@yoda.pi.musin.de) Received: (from sec@localhost) by yoda.pi.musin.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA14685 for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Mon, 29 Jun 1998 13:20:03 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from sec) Message-ID: <19980629132002.A13667@yoda.pi.musin.de> Date: Mon, 29 Jun 1998 13:20:02 +0200 From: Stefan Zehl To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Staroffice 4.0 sp3 running Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.92.6i I-love-doing-this: really X-URL: http://sec.42.org/ Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, I just managed to install Staroffice 4.0sp3. It requires the file /proc//cmdline to run. Fortunately due to the linux emulation layer, you can guess the PID the running process will have, and touch /compat/linux/proc//cmdline - this will suffice for it to run. I have just added (an dummy-version of) cmdline in my local copy of procfs, but I remember that there was some talk, not to 'bloat' procfs with such things. I'm basdically asking now, which route do we want to take ? an addition to our procfs ? an seperate linux-procfs ? CU, Sec -- Komme wieder To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message