Date: Sun, 22 May 2016 11:13:18 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: python@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 205852] Be nicer about multiple sqlalchemy ports Message-ID: <bug-205852-21822-AMLp98qaZL@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-205852-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-205852-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D205852 Matthew Seaman <matthew@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |matthew@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #19 from Matthew Seaman <matthew@FreeBSD.org> --- After r415627 (PR 191442, D908) there are now 5 sqlalchemy ports: Port Version ---------------------------- py-sqlalchemy06 0.6.9 py-sqlalchemy07 0.7.10 py-sqlalchemy08 0.8.7 py-sqlalchemy09 0.9.10 py-sqlalchemy10 1.0.13 This should allow girgen to proceed with his work, and in principle it perm= its writing a glob expression '${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX}sqlalchemy[01][67890]' to match only the SQLAlchemy ports as suggest by Mikhail, but on the whole I t= hink simply reviewing each of the ports that depends on sqlalchemy and having th= em depend on the latest possible version would be the way to go. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-205852-21822-AMLp98qaZL>