From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 14 18:58:18 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 359383CE for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 18:58:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrey@zonov.org) Received: from mail-la0-f42.google.com (mail-la0-f42.google.com [209.85.215.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADDEEDF9 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 18:58:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f42.google.com with SMTP id fe20so4274906lab.29 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 10:58:16 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :x-gm-message-state; bh=+yrpleQCSlEniC6uiAqJqD4GHG4+2rhGqtvVHSevTWM=; b=RoGPrI5tyn7GHkXEQ+UWcFcYEIIgHXI5h3o5KTYI2X6kJGVOOTkoFf5snBS/FaFlKY 7+6I0J/Os/zPGlxVXqU2mfwyHzAC+2I5OxoD0WYK53uoHy0Ddf7VD5Hx/qIytdiwwzgK YnzLRbBWUG2GQdAvnF9/DJSrLC4MyZE6oVqm7Z2pvapsSWE/3onTm1mmAqB/spdhCrgZ mV44nKYnU9DxITa8wvD2oTDLttPGgcJQ/x6gfwtGsUYCWvqQwpD1OtO9Gg6ldrupSEUZ Jvy3cFr6vaghY0+Oho6MNerpiIOgRLx3g9x2mteOWRR78vkGVA5p3oW8i/1hYgOxz/Fd 5dBw== X-Received: by 10.152.122.133 with SMTP id ls5mr84441104lab.9.1358189896187; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 10:58:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from zont-osx.local (ppp95-165-128-93.pppoe.spdop.ru. [95.165.128.93]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e7sm2185781lbn.1.2013.01.14.10.58.14 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 14 Jan 2013 10:58:15 -0800 (PST) Sender: Andrey Zonov Message-ID: <50F45542.3070206@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 22:58:10 +0400 From: Andrey Zonov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yuri Subject: Re: Is there any modern alternative to pstack? References: <4F775DF5.1020704@rawbw.com> <4F8A8CD2.5020103@rawbw.com> <20120415093029.GR2358@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <201204160959.29089.jhb@freebsd.org> <50206296.4060802@rawbw.com> In-Reply-To: <50206296.4060802@rawbw.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="----enig2OOPONPSGXQRANFISOXJJ" X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmOEG/mxJ/UoZM+TL3+dimKKdvocLltcU+a2Q+OtjdEQJxBjWcbjBgIcnIzMKfXaP/JeYgD Cc: Konstantin Belousov , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 18:58:18 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) ------enig2OOPONPSGXQRANFISOXJJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 8/7/12 4:34 AM, Yuri wrote: > On 04/16/2012 06:59, John Baldwin wrote: >> I'm fine with putting it into the base. If so, we should import 1.2 >> first I >> think and then apply the 1.3 patch. >=20 > So are there plans to import it into the base? Maybe for 9.1? > /usr/ports/sysutils/pstack is still i386 only. >=20 Try this version [1]. I plan to update sysutils/pstack to it. [1] https://github.com/z0nt/pstack --=20 Andrey Zonov ------enig2OOPONPSGXQRANFISOXJJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQ9FVFAAoJEBWLemxX/CvTUm8H/3iY10xJ5eUYaOQiftibxRTp clXNXPV8rFBPywBqyKRu7AUh7gXc8H1SpGHfngUIc8f1ozkk/uJynIfmr/vTLe0k zhyqLIFkAPFm61FeMOR89RXrOEWPzVqsiGHQ8qXGlz6IOPowQ4DFAEwpp4B2+89e J/7tPdjhwwUe0fckkarBzA/UbytMwhMhVzrXqqGEu6RR7HyxeZOSerYRrO3mb6y0 QjdD/WZyWPWLw40LqqGIYYjsO4Ocbzcpi5C9LoKnBcQwHVGUtwnvP9XQnx/3LoYQ wxeV15F9GhF4uKHHToNFTRNW20K4p8T4HgjWuO/XJTbBAkVvIJnlDgb9Qz7yMGY= =kprN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------enig2OOPONPSGXQRANFISOXJJ--