Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 18:55:42 +0100 From: bsd <bsd@todoo.biz> To: Liste FreeBSD <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Cc: Victor Lyapunov <fullblaststorm@gmail.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD IPSec stack contains backdoors? Message-ID: <C6BD1E5D-CB95-49F4-BE69-F25C2B6D421C@todoo.biz> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimQAZ5J5CB4ub7RAQZw93cKD6UxBaYa%2BU6M597Q@mail.gmail.com> References: <AANLkTimQAZ5J5CB4ub7RAQZw93cKD6UxBaYa%2BU6M597Q@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is not so clear ! http://www.itworld.com/open-source/130820/openbsdfbi-allegations-denied-named-participant We should ask competent persons like Colin Percival the FreeBSD Security Officer since 2005. He would have a point of view much more precise than anyone of us could have. ;-) Le 15 dιc. 2010 ΰ 15:23, Victor Lyapunov a ιcrit : > Hi folks, > Recently OpenBSD developer Gregory Perry disclosed information about > possible backdoors in OpenBSD IPSec stack (see > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.tech/22557) In particular, > Gregory Perry, who has been working on a OpenBSD -ish implementation > of IPSec says a number of backdoors have been introduced into the > code. > > As far as I am aware, FreeBSD contains considerable amount of code > ported from OpenBSD. The question is: was the FreeBSD's ipsec code > ported from OpenBSD's implementation? If so, what might be the impact > of this? > > Thanks, > Victor Lyapunov. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" ---------> Grιgory Bernard Director <--------- ---------------> www.osnet.eu <--------------- --> Your provider of OpenSource appliances <-- OSnetOSnetOSnetOSnetOSnetOSnetOSnetOSnetOSnetO
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?C6BD1E5D-CB95-49F4-BE69-F25C2B6D421C>