From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu May 9 10: 4:31 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from hawk.mail.pas.earthlink.net (hawk.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.22]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B038D37B404 for ; Thu, 9 May 2002 10:04:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pool0470.cvx22-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([209.179.199.215] helo=mindspring.com) by hawk.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 175rKi-0001La-00; Thu, 09 May 2002 10:04:00 -0700 Message-ID: <3CDAABE2.D68352DB@mindspring.com> Date: Thu, 09 May 2002 10:03:30 -0700 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en]C-CCK-MCD {Sony} (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Brian T.Schellenberger" Cc: Greg Black , Ian , freebsd-hackers Subject: Re: /usr/include/netinet/in.h References: <20020509055851.5BA03BB29@i8k.babbleon.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Brian T.Schellenberger" wrote: > **BUT** this is beside the point. When working with code withing a > particular project (such as FreeBSD), you should conform to its conventions, > not the other way 'round. He's actually trying to compile code from an old Linux system, using the project code as a platform, so this argument is not really valid. "**BUT**" ...the code is not going to compile on modern versions of Linux, either, since they have done the same thing with regard to interface promiscuity that FreeBSD did, when they switched to glibc 5. 8-). -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message