Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 14:06:43 +0800 From: Jiawei Ye <leafy7382@gmail.com> To: "Michael C. Shultz" <ringworm01@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why does security/amavisd-new depend on db3? Message-ID: <c21e92e20511142206q216c8b4br9dc96ab309d054d5@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <c21e92e20511142201o70752d66p20b4ef233612d6e@mail.gmail.com> References: <c21e92e20511130557g4ad76176l85beb6ceee078886@mail.gmail.com> <200511142145.05316.ringworm01@gmail.com> <c21e92e20511142201o70752d66p20b4ef233612d6e@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/15/05, Jiawei Ye <leafy7382@gmail.com> wrote:
> It is correct when you invoke it manually, but I rebuilt p5-BerkeleyDB
> numerous times already and still get wrong dependancies for
> amavisd-new.
>
>
> Jiawei
One more point to add, the dependanc recorded for p5-BerkeleyDB is
actually correct.
root@chihiro:/usr/ports/databases/p5-BerkeleyDB# pkg_glob -R
databases/p5-BerkeleyDB
perl-threaded-5.8.7
db42-4.2.52_4
p5-BerkeleyDB-0.27
It looks like somehow when determining dependancies for amavisd-new,
it did not reference the option set for p5-BerkeleyDB.
Jiawei
--
"Without the userland, the kernel is useless."
--inspired by The Tao of Programming
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?c21e92e20511142206q216c8b4br9dc96ab309d054d5>