From owner-freebsd-current Fri Jul 28 17:39:55 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from dt052n3e.san.rr.com (dt052n3e.san.rr.com [204.210.33.62]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D30B37B5C3; Fri, 28 Jul 2000 17:39:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@gorean.org) Received: from gorean.org (master [10.0.0.2]) by dt052n3e.san.rr.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA12353; Fri, 28 Jul 2000 17:39:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@gorean.org) Message-ID: <398227D5.9E7AEAA5@gorean.org> Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2000 17:39:49 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eivind Eklund Cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: *** HEADS UP *** rc.conf changes (security) References: <20000729004143.M45306@ee.follo.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Eivind Eklund wrote: > This change might seem a little counterintuitive (given that > /etc/defaults/ are for defaults, after all) but seems to be the best > compromise for both getting the functionality jkh wants (freshly > installed boxes have active daemons, so users don't feel they have a > lot of extra hassle to get things up and working like they are used to > on other Unixen), and give FreeBSD a default secure config, meaning > the insecurities stand out. FWIW, I totally support this change. Personally, I think the default for everything should be "off," and the admin should be required to enable the services he needs. Eivind, it's good to see you, even semi-active. :) Doug To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message