From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 24 14:29:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4E7016A4DF for ; Mon, 24 Jul 2006 14:29:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 942F043D68 for ; Mon, 24 Jul 2006 14:29:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 31652 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2006 14:29:12 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 24 Jul 2006 14:29:12 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 96A592842A; Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:29:11 -0400 (EDT) To: Jim Pazarena References: <44C4AAF4.1050603@ccstores.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:29:11 -0400 In-Reply-To: <44C4AAF4.1050603@ccstores.com> (Jim Pazarena's message of "Mon, 24 Jul 2006 04:11:48 -0700") Message-ID: <443bcrjcug.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: scsi performance these days X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 14:29:13 -0000 Jim Pazarena writes: > does FreeBSD (6.1) "still" operate better on a SCSI drive > system compared to EIDE or SATA ? For some values of better, yes. Especially if the drive supports tagged queueing and your environment has a number of different workloads competing with each other. For other values of better, no.