From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Dec 17 11:57: 4 2000
From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Dec 17 11:57:02 2000
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (winston.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.27.229])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 65AA737B400; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 11:57:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by winston.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id eBHJuxw07616;
	Sun, 17 Dec 2000 11:57:00 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com)
To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc: Patryk Zadarnowski <pat@jantar.org>, Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>,
	SteveB <admin@bsdfan.cncdsl.com>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: kernel type 
In-Reply-To: Message from Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG> 
   of "Sun, 17 Dec 2000 12:27:55 EST." <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1001217121531.48123B-100000@fledge.watson.org> 
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2000 11:56:59 -0800
Message-ID: <7612.977083019@winston.osd.bsdi.com>
From: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> service environment -- I've been seriously considering looking at adapting
> FreeBSD to use netinfo also, given that it provides a time-tested model
> for configuration management (local and distributed).  It probably needs
> some cleaning up in the security sense, and possibly rewriting, but it's a
> strong starting point, and liberally licensed.  What runs under that

I think that's a good idea.  I've been having some of the same thoughts. :)

- Jordan


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message