Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 23:01:54 -0400 From: Francisco Reyes <lists@stringsutils.com> To: Zane =?ISO-8859-1?B?Qy5CLg==?= <v.velox@vvelox.net> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr> Subject: Re: Filesystems larger than 2TB? Message-ID: <cone.1181530914.692841.13436.1000@zoraida.natserv.net> References: <cone.1181435058.668170.9868.1000@zoraida.natserv.net> <f4gttm$t35$2@sea.gmane.org> <cone.1181484821.884802.9541.1000@zoraida.natserv.net> <20070610142832.11ecfaff@vixen42>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Zane C.B. writes: > In such a situation, I would seperate the data drives and the OS > drives, instead of having them in one big raid. This makes it a lot > more manageable. Ok. Let me see if I understand. So I could take say 2 drives and make it raid 1. T hen make another raid with the rest of the drives and I would then newfs -s the raw partition? I also think 3ware controllers allow to take part of a raid display it separately, but still only have one raid. Will check before I do my next "large" machine. Thanks for all the feedback.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?cone.1181530914.692841.13436.1000>