From owner-freebsd-sparc  Wed Jul 12 23:14:23 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc@freebsd.org
Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58DDB37BA5F
	for <freebsd-sparc@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 23:14:21 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from bright@fw.wintelcom.net)
Received: (from bright@localhost)
	by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id e6D6EAE11420;
	Wed, 12 Jul 2000 23:14:10 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 23:14:10 -0700
From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>
To: John Hay <jhay@icomtek.co.za>
Cc: freebsd-sparc@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: sparc64 or sparc_v9 or ...
Message-ID: <20000712231410.M25571@fw.wintelcom.net>
References: <200007130536.e6D5aA373755@zibbi.mikom.csir.co.za>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i
In-Reply-To: <200007130536.e6D5aA373755@zibbi.mikom.csir.co.za>; from jhay@icomtek.co.za on Thu, Jul 13, 2000 at 07:36:10AM +0200
Sender: owner-freebsd-sparc@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

* John Hay <jhay@icomtek.co.za> [000712 22:36] wrote:
> 
> What are we going to use for MACHINE and MACHINE_ARCH on the Ultra? I see
> NetBSD use sparc64 for both and it looks like BSDI use sparc_v9, if I
> look at the directory names.

The BSD/os convention should be followed.

-Alfred


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-sparc" in the body of the message