From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 09:51:50 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17CD7106566C for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 09:51:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (unknown [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E995E8FC0A for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 09:51:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id q0E9pmdp076955 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 14 Jan 2012 01:51:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.14.2/Submit) with UUCP id q0E9pm2X076954; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 01:51:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from fbsd81 ([192.168.200.81]) by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA02642; Sat, 14 Jan 12 01:36:58 PST Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 08:36:34 -0800 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: Alexander@Leidinger.net Message-Id: <4f11af12.laG1ZsKm3Q69c5qZ%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <4F0F9174.9000208@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20120113224506.0000765f@unknown> In-Reply-To: <20120113224506.0000765f@unknown> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@herveybayaustralia.com.au Subject: Re: libcups dependencies and linux apps printing X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 09:51:50 -0000 Alexander Leidinger wrote: > For critical dependencies (ports which are depended upon by > several ports) it is better when a group of people maintain > them (more people are always welcome ;-) ). and yet, having a port maintained by ports@ -- which is quite a large group -- tends _not_ to be considered a good thing :)